Entering New Markets in Luxury: the strategy that defines your growth… and your aura

president LUXONOMY™ Group
Expanding internationally in luxury is not about “opening countries.” It is about transferring an entire brand universe — codes, rituals, service culture, distribution control, narrative and aesthetic consistency — into a new territory without damaging the most delicate asset of all: exclusivity. In high-end markets, how you enter matters as much as where you enter. Often, it matters more.
In mass markets, brands can afford to learn through mistakes. In luxury, a single misstep can stay embedded in the collective memory of clients, opinion leaders and specialized media for years. A local partner who discounts, a point of sale without standards, a poorly managed license or an expansion that is too fast boost short-term revenue while quietly eroding desirability — the invisible force that sustains pricing power, loyalty and prestige. That is why choosing the right market entry strategy is not an operational chapter; it is a matter of identity.
The first question is not “which model,” but “what kind of market”
Before discussing franchises, joint ventures or acquisitions, a luxury brand must decide whether the target country is strategic or complementary. A strategic market is one that, due to its size, growth or cultural influence, can become a core revenue pillar or a reputational benchmark. A complementary market can be profitable, but does not initially justify a heavy structure.
This distinction shapes everything: how much control is required, how much capital can be committed, and how much strategic patience the brand can afford. In luxury, the instinct is to seek total control — but that is not always workable. The art lies in deciding where full control is essential and where a lighter model can deliver presence without compromising the brand’s DNA.
Luxury plays by different rules: the channel is part of the product
In luxury, distribution is not just distribution. The boutique, the corner, the hotel, the dealership or the showroom are part of the product itself, just as much as leather, engineering or formulation. Any entry model that weakens control over experience, pricing or environment puts global coherence at risk.
For this reason, luxury brands function within a decisive triangle: control, speed and investment. You can’t maximize all three at once. Enter quickly and cheaply, and you give up control. Seek total control with speed, and you pay with capital. Aim for total control with low investment, and growth will be slow.
From there, the choice becomes clear.
Selective distribution and exporting: a refined way to test the waters
Many brands start with selective distribution agreements: watches and fine jewelry through authorized retailers, premium wines and spirits via specialized importers, automotive through official importers. This allows demand to be tested without building a proprietary network.
It works when experience can be maintained at a high level through an exceptional partner, or when the channel is naturally intermediated. Yet once real potential appears, the model quickly shows its limits: reduced control, limited access to client data, and a higher risk of inconsistencies. In luxury, this is usually a transitional phase before deeper commitment.
Licensing: growth without capital, with a high risk of dilution
Licensing allows a third party to produce and sell under the brand in exchange for royalties. On paper, it looks appealing. In practice, within luxury, it is the most delicate strategy.
Once the brand name is ceded, the critical question becomes who controls quality, design, channel and narrative. If the answer is not “the maison itself, relentlessly,” dilution becomes. The industry has already experienced a clear shift toward reducing licenses to regain global coherence.
Ferrari offers a revealing example: after years of extensive brand exploitation across multiple categories, the company chose to cut back on agreements to protect its positioning and prevent its emblem from becoming commonplace. The message is clear: in luxury, immediate revenue can’t mortgage future brand equity.
Licensing only works when limited to very specific categories, with top-tier partners and extreme governance.
Franchising: fast expansion with standards, without ownership
Franchising enables growth through local capital and operations while replicating the brand’s store concept and experience. In luxury, it is used selectively, particularly in regions where powerful local groups control prime locations and premium retail.
Its appeal lies in speed and in the market knowledge provided by the partner. Unlike licensing, franchising requires strict adherence to image, service and merchandising standards. Still, a structural tension remains: franchisees seek to improve sales, while the brand prioritizes exclusivity and coherence.
As markets mature and become strategic, brands often wish to internalize operations. Reacquiring franchises can be complex and costly, which makes it essential to foresee this potential evolution from the start.
Joint ventures: balance between control and local leverage
A joint venture creates a shared entity with a local partner. It is particularly effective in markets with regulatory barriers, cultural complexity or restricted access to strategic assets.
This model allows risk and investment to be shared, local insight to be integrated and direct influence over key decisions to be maintained. It has thus been widely used in complex markets and in projects combining complementary capabilities.
The main risk lies in governance. If partners are not aligned on vision, pace of expansion and brand priorities, management becomes heavy and slow. In luxury, where details define value, such friction is instantly visible.
Acquisitions: buying presence, talent and instant access
Acquiring a local player offers immediate infrastructure, clientele and market knowledge. It delivers speed and scale, but requires careful integration.
The classic risks are overpayment and cultural mismatch. If integration is mishandled or the local essence is lost, value erodes quickly. Acquisition is best suited to markets that are core, assets that are hard to replicate, and companies with real integration skill.
Wholly owned subsidiaries: greatest investment, utmost control
A wholly owned subsidiary is the preferred route for brands that treat brand coherence as non-negotiable and for markets that evolve into revenue pillars.
It enables full control over experience, pricing, service, storytelling and client relationships, while capturing the entire margin. The cost is high: capital, structure, local learning and long-term commitment. Yet in large markets, the strategic return outweighs the investment.
Hermès exemplifies this philosophy through organic growth, extreme control and long-term patience to protect identity.
Luxury hospitality: management contracts as the dominant model
In high-end hospitality, the brand typically manages the experience while the asset belongs to an investor. Management contracts allow global expansion without tying up capital in real estate, while maintaining tight operational control. The model places service excellence at the center of brand value.
Choosing wisely: one rule that explains almost everything
The decision usually follows a simple equation: the greater the strategic importance of the market and the need for control, the more direct the entry should be. The greater the uncertainty or the more limited the resources, the more sense it makes to rely on partners.
In practice, many brands combine strategies and evolve over time: they start with lighter models, learn, confirm demand and internalize operations when the market justifies it. That evolution is not a mistake; it is intelligent design.
The Luxonomy closing
A luxury brand does not enter a country; it settles into a culture. That settlement requires decisions that protect what is non-negotiable — the aura — while building what is essential: presence, data, clients and profitability.
The entry strategy is the first real test of coherence. In luxury, growing without becoming ordinary is not an ambition. It is a responsibility.
Share/Compártelo
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- More
Related
Discover more from LUXONOMY
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.












